IT is the heartbeat of any growing business. It powers your payments, protects your data, keeps your teams connected and your customers served. And when it stops, everything feels it. In fact, IT downtime can cost UK businesses anywhere between £4,000 and £200,000 per hour — a sobering reminder that your technology setup isn’t just a back-office decision, it’s a strategic one.
That’s why the question of whether to build an in-house IT team or partner with an outsourced provider matters so much. It’s not simply about who fixes laptops or resets passwords. It’s about cost, security, scalability, control, access to talent, and how quickly your business can adapt and innovate.
So, which model gives you the edge? Let’s break down the key considerations to help you decide what’s right for your organisation.
In-house IT: pros and cons
Bringing IT in-house means building your own team — people embedded in your business who manage everything from daily support tickets to long-term technology strategy. It can feel like the most controlled and personalised option. But like any model, it comes with trade-offs.
The pros
-
Immediate, on-site support: your IT team is right there when you need them. Issues can be resolved face-to-face, often within minutes. There’s no need to explain your systems to an external provider — they already know your infrastructure, your people, and your pressure points.
-
Full control and customisation: you set the priorities. You decide which projects move first, how systems are configured, and how tightly technology aligns with your wider business strategy. Solutions can be built specifically around your processes, rather than adapted to fit someone else’s framework.
-
Strong cultural alignment: an internal IT team understands how your business really operates — including the unofficial workflows and departmental nuances. That familiarity builds trust, improves communication, and often leads to smoother collaboration across teams.
The cons
- High and ongoing costs: salaries are only part of the picture. Once you factor in National Insurance, pensions, recruitment fees, training, software licences, and hardware upgrades, costs rise quickly. Even a single mid-level IT manager can cost far more than their base salary once overheads are included. For smaller or scaling businesses, building a multi-person team can significantly stretch budgets.
- Limited expertise and coverage: modern IT spans cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, compliance, networking, user support, and more. One or two individuals simply can’t be experts in everything. Skills gaps are common, and if a key team member is on leave — or leaves permanently — knowledge and capacity go with them. Many in-house teams also operate within standard office hours unless extended cover is funded.
- Scalability challenges: as your business grows, your IT demands grow with it. Hiring and onboarding new staff takes time and money. During rapid expansion or major system rollouts, internal teams can become stretched, causing delays and bottlenecks.
- Risk of stagnation: smaller internal teams can become comfortable with the status quo. Without regular exposure to broader industry trends and innovations, adoption of new technologies may slow. Over time, what once felt cutting-edge can quietly become outdated.
Outsourced IT: Pros and Cons
Outsourcing IT means partnering with an external provider — often a Managed Service Provider (MSP) — to handle some or all of your technology operations. Instead of employing a full internal team, you enter into a contract or service-level agreement, and the provider supplies the people, tools, and expertise needed to keep your systems running.
For many growing businesses, this model offers a different kind of flexibility — and a different set of trade-offs.
The pros
- Cost efficiency and predictability: rather than carrying multiple full-time salaries, training costs, and infrastructure investments, you pay a predictable monthly fee for the services you actually use. This often turns IT from a large fixed overhead into a scalable operating expense. You can budget more accurately — and avoid surprise recruitment or hardware costs.
- Access to broad, specialist expertise: IT today spans cloud architecture, cybersecurity, compliance, networking, user support and more. An outsourced provider typically employs specialists across all these areas. Instead of relying on one or two generalists, you gain access to a full bench of expertise — often difficult and expensive to build in-house.
- Scalability on demand: opening a new office? Rolling out a new system? Scaling quickly? An outsourced partner can usually increase support and infrastructure without the delays of hiring and onboarding new staff. Equally, if your business contracts or pauses a project, services can often scale down just as smoothly.
- 24/7 monitoring and support: many providers offer round-the-clock monitoring. If something fails at 2am, there’s a team ready to respond. You’re not reliant on one individual’s availability, and your systems are supported beyond standard office hours — which can significantly reduce downtime risk.
- Sharper focus on your core business: with day-to-day IT management handled externally, your leadership team can focus on growth, innovation, and strategic priorities — rather than troubleshooting servers or managing software patches.
The cons
- Less direct control: when you outsource, you inevitably give up some hands-on control. You rely on the provider to prioritise tasks in line with your agreement. That’s why clearly defined service levels and regular communication are essential — your business goals must remain front and centre.
- Potential communication or cultural gaps: an external team won’t automatically understand your internal dynamics, workflows, or industry nuances. Without strong onboarding and ongoing collaboration, support can feel less personal. The right partner will invest time in learning your business and building genuine relationships.
- Vendor dependency and trust: outsourcing introduces a new layer of vendor management. You’re placing critical systems in the hands of a third party, so due diligence is vital. Transparency, clear reporting, and well-documented processes help ensure you’re never overly dependent on one provider.
- Data security and compliance considerations: sharing system access with an external provider requires confidence in their security standards. The upside is that many MSPs can deploy advanced monitoring, patching, and backup solutions that smaller in-house teams might struggle to implement. The key is ensuring their compliance practices align fully with your industry requirements and data protection obligations.
What's right for you?
Ultimately, the decision comes down to what matters most to your business. If predictable monthly costs, access to a wide bench of expertise, and 24/7 support give you confidence, outsourcing may feel like the safer, more scalable route. On the other hand, if you value hands-on control, immediate on-site assistance, and technology that’s shaped entirely around your internal processes, building an in-house team — or even adopting a hybrid model — could be the better fit.
There’s no universal answer. The right choice is the one that aligns with your growth plans, risk appetite, and operational priorities. Take the time to weigh cost against capability, flexibility against control, and short-term savings against long-term strategy. When your IT model matches your business ambitions, it stops being a support function — and starts becoming a true enabler of success.




